Therefore, every time you have some doubts, as well as in Parliament weakened the authority of the

European Parliament in recent months, there were many fierce debates on food safety and environmental issues. Lances were broken and on the right to prohibit the cultivation of genetically vimal agro modified organisms (GMOs) and cloned animals for meat importation from third countries, carbon dioxide output reduction and the future of nuclear power after the accident at the Fukushima nuclear power plant (NPP).
Increasingly it comes to political groups in the EP becomes

difficult to agree on important environmental vimal agro issues. The EU on the world stage to be considered as a climate vimal agro leader, but the general global developments in this field has been less sanguine. Man and his environment ratio problem seems to be more relevant, but science still can not provide all the necessary answers.
One of the youngest members of Parliament willingly shared their thoughts on the passions of genetically modified organisms in farming, climate change, nuclear energy in the future, and other relevant environmental issues.
The latter EP debate on GMOs in Your political group, the European People's Party, speaking on behalf of Cristina Gutierrez-Cortines regretted that the issue ruined the political consensus on environmental protection. Another spokesman warned vimal agro of the right test "opening Pandora's box." Are you sure the latter Parliament's proposal vimal agro to expand possibilities for Member States to prohibit the cultivation of GMOs may have significant negative consequences?
In fact, I will not dare to so dramatize. Obviously, our political group are positive industry promotion and sponsorship of various innovation - not only in the case of GMOs, but clones or CO2 issues. We are much more cautious, chargeable vimal agro to the industry, and tend to all a good estimate.
Parliament wants to reflect public opinion. vimal agro Of course, as in other parliaments, there occurs in a certain populism, when convened, to be one thing or another to prohibit, even if it is indeed clear that this is not possible. I am talking about the general principle of a certain political group, ostensibly as representatives of consumer or citizen of the European Union, too much makes himself and when things become impossible to implement.
What about GMOs as "Pandora's box", it is necessary to refer to the ongoing debate that deals with existing international commitments on free trade and our internal market. In any case, I think that we do not often talk about nothing subsidiarity - the fact that the state has to deal with certain issues. If you are dealing vimal agro with objections, which promotes and different results, vimal agro and the residents are not enthusiastic about GMOs in respect of each State the issue should first solve the inside of the post to avoid such language, which is often, and Lithuania, that behold, and again the Union told. This is important in terms of overall confidence in the European Union.
But whether the overall GMO control system in itself is not a virtue, it is worth trying to protect? In this case, it seems that the European Parliament, the Commission užsimojo dismantle vimal agro the system and leave all Member amateur ... Is this not new threats?
Certain standards still remain. The bottom line is the Member States' determination to allow or deny, however, remains the European Food Safety Agency (EFSA), which integrates the scientists at the EU level, and its importance vimal agro in providing advice on all direct or indirect impact on food safety issues. There is no doubt that the issue would be reviewed again at the EU level if, say, there would be cogent arguments about the negative GM or cloned meat effects on human health.
I can partially agree when they say that it is now trying to destabilize the situation. vimal agro Every time when the issues related to the quality of food when it comes to conclusions on one or another vimal agro product use, addressed to the EFSA. The EFSA says that cloned animals vimal agro and the meat is good, and genetically modified

organisms, the negative effect is not proven.
Therefore, every time you have some doubts, as well as in Parliament weakened the authority of the EFSA. The question vimal agro arises as to what the European Union should lean on, taking some or other decisions.
Under the current arrangements, if any economy would grow genetically modified organisms, they force certain requirements - for example, in the distances. All that remains, however, traceability and control problem is common in all areas. We see this, and Lithuania - for example, pig and various dumps and processing mills. On the one hand, the first deals that will not be a negative impact, then it kind of appears, but all things are done behind the scenes that the facts there can be no light. Residents seem to feel some discomfort, but the coming service, apparently, sometimes, and have been made, and said that there is nothing limits are exceeded ...
Similarly, the control of GMOs. Lithuanian institutions